The Whole Story from Mr Blog I am Independent voter. Feels real good.
* November 29, 2007 - Help Recycle has joined News Jungle
* Nov. 29, 2007 - Help Recycle has joined News Jungle
* Dec. 15, 2005 - Bush calls Iraq election major step forward
Who Will be the Next President? Read on at Newsjungle.com
|
Bush calls Iraq election major step forward
16 Dec 2005 00:22:23 GMT
Source: Reuters
|
By Steve Holland
WASHINGTON, Dec 15 (Reuters) - Standing with Iraqis whose ink-stained fingers showed they voted, President George W. Bush said Iraq´s election on Thursday was a big step to meeting U.S. goals and he hoped it would send a message to Iran and Syria.
Faced with wide U.S. public disapproval of his Iraq strategy and eager to show any progress, Bush hailed the millions of Iraqis who voted for "defying the terrorists and refusing to be cowed into not voting."
"There´s a lot of joy as far as I´m concerned in seeing the Iraqi people accomplish this major milestone on the march to democracy," Bush said.
He appeared in the Oval Office with five Iraqi Americans who voted at ballot places in the United States and who had ink-stained fingers to indicate they had voted.
Bush is under mounting pressure from Americans to show progress in Iraq that will enable a reduction in U.S. troops next year.
"This is a major step forward in achieving our objective" of a democratic Iraq and ally in the Middle East, Bush said. He hoped Iraq´s example would "send such a powerful example to others in the region, whether they live in Iran or Syria for example."
Washington says Iran and Syria are interfering with a drive to end the Iraqi insurgency and create a democratic Iraq.
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, an architect of a war fought over unproved allegations that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, called the election "a defeat for the enemies of the Iraqi people."
"It constituted a defeat to the people who have been doing the beheading, and conducting the suicide raids, and threatening people and assassinating people," he said.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the Iraqi people had shown their commitment to democracy against great odds butcautioned that a successful election was an incremental step forward.
"They´ve still got a ways to go and we keep our fingers crossed because the terrorists have every rason to want to disrupt what is happening here," Rice said on Fox News.
CUTTING TROOP LEVELS
There are now about 155,000 U.S. troops in Iraq, but the United States plans to reduce the force, recently bolstered to help protect elections, down to the usual level of about 137,000 early next year.
Going lower than that would depend on the security situation.
Twenty-four House Democrats, including Minority Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland and 11 members of the Armed Services Committee, said in a letter to Bush that the elections gave the United States the chance to reduce its involvement in Iraq.
The letter said the U.S. military presence "should decrease significantly in the next 12 months" and its role should be limited to isolating and defeating foreign terrorists there.
Iraq must take responsibility for defeating domestic security threats, the Democrats said, and the United States "must not be a proxy in an Iraqi civil war" if Sunni and Baathist violence against the government continues.
The election is expected to pave the way for establishing a permanent government. The U.S. ambassador in Baghdad, Zalmay Khalilzad, told Reuters: "Since no single party will have a majority there will be a need for a very broad-based coalition."
But the determining factor for the Bush administration in bringing home U.S. troops is whether Iraqi forces are sufficiently trained to fight the insurgency.
"There is still lots of tough work to do and we should expect the insurgency not to just go away because there were elections," said U.S. Army Gen. George Casey, commander of U.S. and coalition forces in Iraq, in remarks piped into the Pentagon from Iraq.
U.S. officials believed the turnout was higher than the 10 million who voted in the October constitutional referendum in Iraq, and they thought that more disaffected Sunni Arabs had voted than previously. (Additional reporting by Charles Aldinger, Caren Bohan and Vicki Allen)
This is some interesting news... 
The Politically Correct Corner |
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
|
* December 8, 2005 - Moderate America - Still Asleep at the Wheel?
Thank you for visiting this blog! If you like what you read, I encourage you to visit the official website for The Doug Zone at: www.TheDougZone.com - You won't regret it!
For those of you not familiar with The Doug Zone, I’d like to take a moment to share a little background surrounding our site and present a realistic picture of the current American political landscape.
The American political system is one which has become almost entirely controlled and manipulated by a tiny fraction of the population known as radicals (both left and right). These radicals, and the hidden agendas they seek to promote, are supported by powerful special interest groups that dictate the direction of our political process, both openly and overtly, through lobbying efforts and the media. The unfortunate reality is that the average American has very little “real” participation in, or impact on, our nation’s political process!
The good news is that a vast awakening has begun in America. Citizens across the country and across the political spectrum have begun to say, “Enough is enough!” We are fed up with having no voice in a system that is plagued with corruption and self-serving politicians who are merely puppets – ably manipulated by the special interest groups. The following diagram serves to effectively illustrate the political landscape currently found in our country.

Today, fully 80% of Americans fall amazingly close to the imaginary, ideological midpoint which divides the political arena in two – the liberals (democrats) and the conservatives (republicans). The individuals comprising this enormous group of citizens share far more in common than they differ on. The majority of these voters find that their individual opinions often land on both sides of the political divide…depending on the given issue.
In a political process which has for so long been dominated by a two-party system so completely out-of-touch with the real world, these voters represent a symbolic “third” political party - one, which until recently, was powerless and devoid of a real voice. However, due to a growing and wide-spread level of disgust with the current condition of American and its political system and fed by a new generation of journalists and media outlets – free from the control of special interests and radical agendas, these Americans are beginning to unite and achieve both an ever growing presence in the political process and tremendous impact on the future direction of our nation.
For the first time in our nation’s history, individuals - at the grass-root’s level - are finally in a position to be both empowered and enlightened on the real issues facing our country. New independent media sources, such as blog sites like The Doug Zone, are delivering news and information to the average American that is free from hidden agendas and political “spin”. The pendulum of power has begun to swing back into the hands of the everyday citizen. Information leads to knowledge and knowledge inevitably leads to power!
An example of the power wielded by these extremists is discernable in the radical left’s success in convincing an entire nation that the single, greatest issue that divides us is religion. This is absolutely absurd – but the majority of Americans have believed this lie for years. The truth is that 85% of Americans claim to accept some form of Christianity. The average American, who finds him or herself squarely in the ranks of the silent majority – the moderate Americans comprising 80% of our nation, has been systematically misled with devastating consequences. A great many have been duped by a small but powerful group of liberal extremists who have utilized special interest groups and the mainstream secular media to execute their own special, hidden agenda. These shrewd predators want nothing more than for the average, moderate democrat to believe that he or she has no other choice but to abandon the “absurdity” of Christianity as a legitimate ingredient in both our nation’s political system and our nation’s ultimate future success and to blindly accept and embrace their radical, atheistic ideology – which many have unfortunately done….Until now!
Today, the hidden agendas of radicals, both on the left and on the right, are being exposed and the real truth surrounding the issues revealed. Americans across our vast geographical and political landscapes are uniting together to confront and develop solutions for important local, state, national and world issues. Nowhere can this be seen more noticeably than with regard to religion. Christians, once separated by an imaginary “political” divide, are now joining together to not only celebrate their faith but to also endeavor to change the unwelcome and detrimental anti-religious path our country has been coerced into traveling down by these radicals.
The war cry from the radical liberals that “Christianity is a private matter that has no “corporate” value in our society” is beginning to fall on more and more deaf ears in the democratic camp. The proof of its fraudulence can be plainly observed by any unbiased American in every corner of our nation. Similarly, the undeniable lack of radical conservative concern over the deterioration of our environment coupled with an absurd denial that industry is a major contributing factor (for example, the Bush administration’s denial of global warming in the face of overwhelming scientific evidence and refusal to implement the Kyoto agreement) is beginning to be rejected by more and more conservatives. Clearly, the conservative ranks of the 80% moderate “third party” are beginning to recognize and understand that, despite the world’s inevitable deterioration as a consequence of the Fall, healthy and legitimate levels of environmentalism, or “creation care” as it is sometimes referred to in Christian circles, is most certainly in accordance with the biblical mandate for our stewardship of God’s creation.
And the far left and right are scared! The liberal extremists are frightened because they both hate and fear religion all together and seek nothing short of extinguishing every last shred of it from our nation’s past, present and future. The conservative extremists are terrified because they regard any attempt to find middle ground between “liberal” and “conservative” Christianity as an attempt to water-down their perception of “true” Christianity. They love “religion” but only when it is practiced their way – cold, legalistic Christianity devoid of love and social responsibility – and only when it serves to advance their own selfish, hidden agenda and special interests (such as protecting big industry – especially within the energy sector).
The Doug Zone is proud to be a leader in the fight to unite and inform Americans about the truth surrounding the real issues facing our great nation. I hope that you will visit often and share our site with others. I also welcome your comments, feedback and tips on breaking issues that impact our communities, nation and the world.
In closing, while I continually strive to provide the absolute best, most accurate information – free of spin and bias – it is vitally important that you always heed the following universal truth: It is our own individual responsibility to research the issues that impact us! Don’t ever believe something simply because so-and-so said it or you read it here in The Doug Zone (or for that matter, anywhere). Draw your own conclusions and make your own decisions based upon real research and study. Just please, do something…don’t remain a member of the “zombie” squad – simply going through the routine of life without ever questioning or caring about the issues impacting that life.
Together, we – the united moderates - can make a difference…we can successfully navigate the cloudy waters of our political system and remedy the dangerous course our nation finds itself on. We can and will once again return America to greatness!
Keep Looking Up! -The Doug |
Comments (57) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
|
* Dec. 5, 2005 - Miss. Republican Seeks More Hurricane Aid
Who Will be the Next President?
Miss. Republican Seeks More Hurricane Aid
Dec 5, 7:50 PM (ET) By ANDREW TAYLOR
 |
(AP) A damaged railroad crossing sign lies among the debris in front of a home damaged by Hurricane... Full Image | | |
WASHINGTON (AP) - In a power play that could expose rifts within the Republican Party and between the White House and Congress, the chairman of the Senate Appropriations panel is pushing to more than double President Bush's latest request for hurricane relief.
Thad Cochran, a veteran Republican from hurricane-ravaged Mississippi, would add more than $18 billion to the $17 billion request submitted by Bush in October. Congress is likely to pass more hurricane relief before adjourning later this month.
Cochran's plan would add $11.5 billion to Bush's $1.5 billion request for Community Development Block Grants to help Katrina, chiefly to help homeowners without flood insurance rebuild or repair their homes. Many homes outside areas traditionally vulnerable to floods - and therefore not insured against Katrina's massive flood surge - were destroyed.
"This would be money for homes that were not in the flood plain but that had flood damage or were destroyed," said Cochran spokeswoman Jenny Manley. "About 30,000 homes (in Mississippi) are eligible."
Cochran would also provide about $4 billion for agriculture disasters across the country, a move that could build political support for the entire relief package. He would also double, to $1 billion, grants for social services such as child care. His proposal is still in draft form.
Whatever Katrina relief is finally agreed to is likely to be added to the must-pass defense budget currently in House-Senate negotiations.
But the plan is likely to encounter stiff resistance from House GOP leaders and conservatives worried that hurricane-related spending is padding the deficit. They are likely to seek to hew more closely to Bush's request to use $17 billion already approved for hurricane relief for new purposes, such as rebuilding highways, levees and federal facilities damaged by the storms.
The White House isn't commenting on Cochran's plan, saying that the pending request is sufficient for now and that a more comprehensive plan will be submitted next year.
"We urge Congress to act on this latest request as quickly as possible to help further the recovery effort," said Scott Milburn, spokesman for the White House budget office. "The latest request is the right approach for this stage of the recovery, but a request for additional funds is expected after the turn of the year."
Gulf state lawmakers, however, are unhappy with the pace of the recovery effort and are worried that some of the momentum felt in the immediate aftermath of the storms has faded.
Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., issued a statement Friday criticizing the recovery effort and asking Bush to redouble the flood relief effort.
"We've dusted ourselves off and are working to restore our infrastructure and residential and business tax base," Lott said. "We need your leadership to ensure that the federal government fulfills its commitment to help Mississippians get back on their feet."
In September, Congress passed two bills providing $62 billion in emergency monies for hurricane relief, mostly to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. That money has been used for near-term recovery efforts such as clearing debris, providing temporary housing and direct aid to individuals.
As it turns out, the White House overestimated the pace of spending. About $37 billion in uncommitted funds remain in FEMA coffers.
The major items in the pending White House request include:
- $6.6 billion for the Pentagon to repair military facilities such as the Keesler air base and the Naval Air Station in New Orleans, repair Navy ships and to pay the costs of military deployments to the region.
- $2.2 billion to the Housing and Urban Development Department to restore housing units for low-income Gulf Coast residents, provide rental assistance and give poor families ownership of rehabilitated federal housing stock.
- $2.4 billion for transportation-related needs such as repairing highways and airport control towers.
- $1.6 billion for the Army Corps of Engineers to repair levees, flood control and navigation projects.
- $1.4 billion to replace the VA medical centers in New Orleans and Biloxi, to replace medication, supplies and equipment for the hospitals and their clinics and to repair damaged national cemeteries.
Separately, Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., has requested another $1.1 billion in additional spending for border security, mostly to upgrade Customs and Border Protection air fleet.
The Politically Correct Corner |
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
|
* Dec. 5, 2005 - DeLay: Victory in Iraq Is 'Our Choice'
Who Will be the Next President? 
DeLay: Victory in Iraq Is 'Our Choice'
Dec 4, 12:40 AM (ET) By JUAN A. LOZANO
HOUSTON (AP) - Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay told a group of soldiers Saturday night that withdrawing troops from Iraq now would be "a death warrant for Americans in future terrorist attacks."
"Iraq right now is the central front on the war on terror, whether we like it or not," DeLay told about 200 soldiers and their families at a banquet held in their honor. "Our choice is not between different visions of victory but between victory and surrender. Only one choice is worth the legacy of the United States and the heroes she has lost in this conflict. Victory is our choice."
At least one protester stood outside during Saturday night's event, holding up a sign criticizing DeLay's stance on the war and calling for troops to come home.
Calls to begin withdrawing troops from Iraq gained momentum last month when Democratic Rep. John Murtha of Pennsylvania, a decorated Vietnam veteran and longtime military supporter, called for a change of direction, saying continued military action in Iraq isn't in the best interests of the United States.
Republican Rep. Jean Schmidt of Ohio added fuel to the fire when she said on the House floor that she had a message for Murtha from a Marine: "Cowards cut and run, Marines never do." The comment caused an uproar, and other Democrats have since echoed Murtha's concerns.
On Saturday, DeLay said talk of troop withdrawal by Democrats, whom he described as the "cut and run caucus," was the wrong thing to do.
"America is America because we don't quit in the face of overwhelming odds," the Texas Republican said. He said Iraqi elections and increasing numbers of U.S.-trained Iraqi troops are signs of success.
The banquet was sponsored by the nonprofit Impact Player Partners, which brings troops together with celebrities, to honor members of the 451st Civil Affairs Battalion, an Army Reserve unit based outside Houston.
Houston Astros pitcher Roger Clemens was among those thanking the soldiers and their families for their hard work and sacrifice.
"You guys are not forgotten in what you do," Clemens said.
At least 185 Texas service members and more than 2,100 U.S. troops in all have died since the war began in March 2003, according to the Department of Defense.
DeLay made no mention of his ongoing legal battles. He was indicted in a campaign finance investigation, accused of illegally funneling corporate donations to Texas candidates. He denies the charges against him
The Politically Correct Corner |
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
|
* Dec. 5, 2005 - DeLay's Money Laundering Charges Upheld! Very Very interesting News
DeLay's Money Laundering Charges Upheld
Dec 5, 8:29 PM (ET) By APRIL CASTRO
 |
(AP) Rep. Tom DeLay, R-Texas, and his wife, Christine, arrive for a court appearance in Austin, Texas,... Full Image | | |
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) - A judge dismissed a conspiracy charge Monday against Rep. Tom DeLay but refused to throw out the far more serious allegations of money-laundering, dashing the congressman's hopes for now of reclaiming his post as House majority leader.
Texas Judge Pat Priest, who is presiding over the case against the Republican, issued the ruling after a hearing late last month in which DeLay's attorney argued that the indictment was fatally flawed.
When he was indicted in September, DeLay was required under House rules to relinquish the leadership post he had held since 2003. While Monday's ruling was a partial victory for DeLay, he cannot reclaim his post because he remains under indictment.
The ruling means the case will move toward a trial next year, though other defense objections to the indictments remain to be heard by the judge.
"The court's decision to dismiss Ronnie Earle's numerous charges against Mr. DeLay underscores just how baseless and politically motivated the charges were," DeLay spokesman Kevin Madden said, referring to the Democratic district attorney who brought the case.
"Mr. DeLay is very encouraged by the swift progress of the legal proceedings and looks forward to his eventual and absolute exoneration based on the facts and the law."
After the judge's decision, DeLay declined to speak with reporters as he entered a Houston hotel for a campaign fundraiser.
In a written statement, Earle's office said prosecutors were studying the ruling and had made no decision about whether to appeal. Prosecutors have 15 days to challenge the decision.
DeLay, 58, and two GOP fundraisers, John Colyandro and Jim Ellis, are accused of illegally funneling $190,000 in corporate donations to 2002 Republican candidates for the Texas Legislature. Under Texas law, corporate money cannot be directly used for political campaigns, but it can be used for administrative purposes.
In asking that the case be thrown out, DeLay lawyer Dick DeGuerin argued that one of the charges - conspiracy to violate the Texas election code - did not even take effect until September 2003, a year after the alleged offenses occurred.
Prosecutors, however, said the crime of conspiracy was already on the books, and could be applied to the election code even though such uses were not explicitly in state law at the time.
The judge was unpersuaded by that argument, and dismissed the conspiracy charge. But the judge upheld charges of money laundering and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Those charges involve an alleged attempt by DeLay to conceal the source of the campaign contributions by funneling the money through his own political action committee and then an arm of the Republican National Committee.
In trying to have those charges thrown out, the defense argued that the Texas money laundering law does not apply to funds in the form of a check, just coins or paper money. But the judge said that checks "are clearly funds and can be the subject of money laundering."
The defense attorneys also argued that the definition of money laundering in Texas involves the transfer of criminal proceeds. Because the money in this case was not illegal to begin with, they argued, money laundering never occurred.
But the judge rejected that argument, saying the money became suspect when "it began to be held with the prohibited intent."
He said if prosecutors can prove that DeLay and his associates obtained the corporate donations "with the express intent of converting those funds to the use of individual candidates," or that they converted money legally collected by sending it to the Republican National Committee and asking for the same amount to be sent back to Texas candidates, "then they will have established that money was laundered."
"The money would have become 'dirty money' at the point that it began to be held with the prohibited intent," Priest wrote.
Conspiracy to violate the election code carries up to two years in prison. Money laundering is punishable by five years to life. Conspiracy to commit money laundering carries two years.
The alleged campaign-finance scheme had far-reaching political effects: With DeLay's fundraising muscle, the GOP took control of the Texas House for the first time in 130 years, then pushed through a congressional redistricting plan engineered by DeLay that resulted in more Texas Republicans going to Congress.
At the court hearing last month, DeLay's lawyers asked for a quick decision on their request for a dismissal, and, if the ruling went against DeLay, a prompt trial, in hopes that he could regain his leadership post by the time the House reconvenes in late January. But the judge said at the time that it was unlikely the case would go to trial before the first of the year.
Rep. Roy Blunt of Missouri became majority leader when DeLay stepped aside.
The judge has yet to rule on a defense bid to move DeLay's trial out of liberal, Democratic-leaning Austin and allegations of prosecutorial misconduct. DeGuerin accused the district attorney of shopping the DeLay case around to different grand juries until he found one that would indict the congressman.
The case ended up before Priest, a Democrat, after DeLay's attorneys had a previous judge removed for contributing to Democratic candidates and causes. Priest has made few political contributions over the years.
The judge acted as a CNN-USA Today/Gallup poll showed that DeLay's political standing has weakened considerably in his home district around Houston.
The survey found that 49 percent of registered voters questioned said they are more likely to vote for a Democratic challenger than for DeLay in 2006, and 36 percent said they would be more likey to vote for DeLay.
Former Democratic Rep. Nick Lampson is planning to challenge DeLay in the 2006 elections.
The survey also found that 55 percent of registered voters said that the charges that DeLay broke campaign finance laws are definitely or probably true, while 34 percent said they were probably or definitely not true.
http://story.news.ask.com//article/20051206/D8EAEJ1G0.html
The Politically Correct Corner |
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
|
* Dec. 5, 2005 - Rice: U.S. Terror Policy Tough, but Legal
Rice: U.S. Terror Policy Tough, but Legal
By ANNE GEARAN, AP Diplomatic Writer
BERLIN -- Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice aggressively defended U.S. tactics against terrorism on Monday as tough but legal, and countered European complaints over reports of secret CIA-run prisons there by saying America's efforts with its allies have been "a two-way street" that have saved European and American lives. Commencing a five-day visit to a Europe that has seethed with resentment over the reports of U.S. prisons and detainee mistreatment, Rice delivered the Bush administration's most forceful response to a month of growing trans-Atlantic acrimony.
| ADVERTISEMENT |
| She also went further than others in the Bush administration to insist that Americans do not practice torture or lesser forms of cruel treatment. "Our people, wherever they are, are operating under U.S. law and U.S. international obligations," Rice said. She said that includes the U.N. Convention Against Torture, a document the administration has previously said does not fully apply to Americans overseas. "Some governments choose to cooperate with the United States" in intelligence and other arenas, Rice said before she left for Europe. "That cooperation is a two-way street. We share intelligence that has helped protect European countries from attack, saving European lives." Her comments seemed to imply that if any European governments provided secret prisons, they did so willingly. Rice did not elaborate on how lives were saved. But White House spokesman Scott McClellan referred reporters to an Oct. 6 statement by President Bush that the United States and its allies had foiled 10 serious plots by the al-Qaida terror network in the past four years. At the time, the White House said those counted several attempted strikes in Europe, including plans to bomb sites in Britain in mid-2004, attack London's Heathrow Airport using hijacked commercial airliners in 2003 and carry out a large-scale bombing in Britain in spring 2004. Throughout Monday, Rice refused any outright answer to the underlying question European governments have asked: Did the United States run clandestine detention sites on the continent? "Were I to confirm or deny, say yes or say no, then I would be compromising intelligence information, and I'm not going to do that," she said on her plane to Germany. The European Union has asked for an explanation of U.S. actions, as have individual European allies concerned that their airports, territory or air space may have been used for detention or transport of suspects under conditions illegal in Europe. The continent's top human rights watchdog is investigating. In Berlin, a government spokesman said Monday that Germany would ask Rice about its list of more than 400 flights and landings in Germany by planes suspected of being used by the CIA. The European Union's justice commissioner says covert prisons and detainee mistreatment would violate European human rights law, and he warned last week that any host countries could lose voting rights in the powerful 25-nation bloc. A November report in The Washington Post said that the CIA ran a network of hidden prisons, including some in Eastern European democracies. The story and its aftermath have rekindled opposition to President Bush and his foreign policy in Europe and have threatened to fray diplomatic ties that Rice has tried to forge this year. The advocacy group Human Rights Watch followed the news report with claims that it has tracked suspicious CIA flights around Europe since the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan. The group pointed to sites in Poland and Romania as probable hosts for secret prisons, but both those nations have denied it. Rice's trip was planned before the controversy broke, and her words Monday were an attempt to keep the issue from completely overshadowing her other business. She put the onus to articulate terrorism policies partly on the shoulders of European allies who also are threatened by al-Qaida. At the same time, she made the point that aggressive work to counter potential terrorists can be uncomfortable for democracies. "The captured terrorists of the 21st century do not fit easily into traditional systems of criminal or military justice," she said. "We need to adapt." Information gathered by U.S. intelligence agencies from a "very small number of extremely dangerous detainees" has helped prevent terrorist attacks in several countries, Rice said. "The United States has fully respected the sovereignty of other countries that have cooperated in these matters," she said. "The United States is a country of laws." Rice's itinerary Tuesday includes a stop in Romania where, by chance, she is to sign a defense agreement related to the military base identified by Human Rights Watch. Bush has said the United States does not allow torture, but the administration has permitted harsh interrogation techniques at the Guantanamo Bay military prison camp and elsewhere that human rights organizations say violate the U.N. treaty. One widely cited method is "waterboarding," in which prisoners are strapped to a plank and dunked repeatedly. The 1994 treaty obligates nations to try to prevent cruelty that does not meet the legal definition of torture. Vice President Dick Cheney has led a lobbying effort against an attempt by Sen. John McCain to expressly forbid such practices under U.S. law. Human rights organizations and legal groups, both in the U.S. and abroad, have also accused the United States of allowing a practice known as "rendition to torture," in which suspects are taken to countries such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia where harsh interrogation methods are used. Rice denied it. "The United States does not use the air space or airport of any country for the purpose of transporting a detainee when we believe he or she will be tortured," she said. That declaration was welcomed by British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw. He said, "All of us must work together -- within the rule of law -- to use every tool at out disposal to deal with the threat of terrorism." * __ On the Net: State Department: http://www.state.gov
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/wire/ats-ap_top14dec05,0,1562826.story
The Politically Correct Corner |
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
|
* Dec. 2, 2005 - Act Blue Link to donate.
* Dec. 2, 2005 - Checkout this link from act Blue
* Dec. 2, 2005 - http://www.actblue.com/ Democratic Networking Website
Who Will be the Next President?
Looking to Start a Grass Root Campaign or just looking for some friends to help with your election?
http://www.actblue.com/
Fundraise for Democrats.
At ActBlue, you can use key online techniques of MoveOn.org, EMILY's List and others to fundraise for the Democratic candidate or candidates of your choice.
1. Choose your candidates.
- Select from among all the Democratic candidates for House and Senate.
- You'll get your own web page where visitors can contribute to your chosen candidates — completely customizable with your own text advocating for them. Examples
2. Recruit your friends.
- Send your family, friends, neighbors and colleagues a link to the page — and they can contribute right then and there.
- Track how many donors and dollars you've recruited to the candidates most important to you.
- Throw a House Party to fundraise for your candidates! Learn More...
Checkout all these features on http://actblue.com
The Politically Correct Corner |
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
|
* Dec. 2, 2005 - Advoing the Primaries: Article From Politics1.com
Who Will be the Next President?
AVOIDING PRIMARIES? Republicans leaders in three key states -- Ohio, Illinois and New York -- are trying to narrow gubernatorial primary fields to improve chances of victories in general elections next year. In Ohio, the AP reported that longtime State GOP Chair Bob Bennett and other leaders know their party is already gravely wounded by term-limited Governor Bob Taft's (R) dismal performance. That's why they want to avoid a three-way primary next year May between a trio of the state's top Republican officials. Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, Attorney General Jim Petro and State Auditor Betty Montgomery are announced candidates for Governor, and Republicans would love it if two of them would exit the contest in favor of other races. Ohio Democrats this week largely rallied behind the gubernatorial campaign of Congressman Ted Strickland (D) when Columbus Mayor Michael Coleman dropped out. In Illinois, former Governor Jim Edgar and other state GOP leaders there are trying to narrow the gubernatorial field in favor of State Treasurer Judy Topinka. According to the Chicago Tribune, State GOP Chair Andrew McKenna "wants the five current candidates for governor to meet with him Friday and review results of new polling that could raise questions about the viability of some of their campaigns." Topinka's two leading primary rivals, wealthy businessman Ron Gidwitz and State Senator Steve Rauschenberger, vow they will not be forced from the race. Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich still may face minor primary opposition, but is assured of being his party's nominee. Meanwhile, in New York, Republican county chairs are already set to meet December 12 to endorse candidates for Governor and US Senate. Governor George Pataki (R) and his allies were behind the move in an effort to endorse former Massachusetts Governor Bill Weld as the candidate for Governor and Westchester County D.A. Jeanine Pirro as the candidate for US Senate. Attorney General Eliot Spitzer and incumbent US Senator Hillary Clinton are assured of being the Dem nominees for Governor and US Senate next year. Those plans seem to be unraveling as State Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno, Congressman John Sweeney and others are attempting to derail the meeting in order to advance the odds of billionaire businessman Tom Golisano for the Governor race and former Yonkers Mayor John Spencer in the US Senate contest. This anti-Pataki faction would also like to steer Pirro into the open Attorney General's race. This "avoid primaries" strategy isn't unique to Republicans. Florida Democrats, for example, would like to find a way to avoid a Jim Davis-Rod Smith gubernatorial primary by steering the two men into running together as a team for Gov and Lt Gov.
We at thwe Politically Correct Corner found this very interesting. These guys are just holding on for the ride!
The Politically Correct Corner |
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
|
* Nov. 24, 2005 - Stop Globalization Joke and Picture
* Nov. 24, 2005 - Microsft Versus GM To Big Influential Companies
Microsoft VS. GM
At a recent computer expo (1996 COMDEX), Bill Gates compared the computer industry to the automotive indusrty by stating: "If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving cars that cost $25.00 and get 1,00 miles to the gallon."
In response to Bills comment, General Motors issued A press release making the following statement: "If we (GM) had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:
1) for no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice per day.
2) Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.
3) Your car would occasionally stop on the freeway without reason. In order to get started again, you would have to pull off to the side of the road, close all the windowsshut off the car resart it and open all the windows again. For some unknown reason, you would simply do this without question.
4) Occasionally, executing a maneuver, such as a left turn, would cause your car to shut down and refuse to resart, in which case you would have to re-install the engine.
5) Only one person could use the car at one time unless you bought "Car95" or "CarNT", but then you would also have to buy more seats.
6) The new seats you would need would force everyone to have the same size butt.
7) You would press the "start" button to shut off the engine.
8) The oil warning light, water warning light, and alternator warning light would all be replaced by a single "Unidentified System Error" light.
9) The air bag would ask ur freshly mangled body "are you sure" before going off.
10) Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you back inuntill you simultaneously lifted the driver side door handle, turned the key, and grabbed the radio antenna.
11) The radio antenna would be internally mounted on the passenger side of the car.
12) buying a new car would force you to also purchase a new set of Deluxe Rand McNally road maps, dispite the fact that you niether need nor want them. Attempting to delet this otion would immediately cause your cars performance to diminish by 50% or more.
13) every time GM introduced a new car, people would have to learn to drive all over again because none of the old controls would function in the new car.
14) Macintosh would make a car that was five times faster, ten times more reliable and easier to mantain, twice as easy to drive, but would only run on five percent of the roads."
This is Why Microsoft makes such a Good target!
The Politically Correct Corner |
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
|
* Nov. 24, 2005 - Frenetic Wanderings. Hey Baby did you fall from Heaven?
* Nov. 24, 2005 - Funny Article I read about "Tennis Elbow" Funny Joke
Who Will be the Next President?
Diagnosis
One day, Pete complained to his friend, "My elbow really hurts. I guess I should see a doctor."
His friend said, "Don't do that. There's a computer at the drug store that can diagnose anything quicker and cheaper than a doctor.
Simply put in a sample of your urine, and the computer will diagnose your problem and tell you what you can do about and it will only costs you $10.00."
Pete figured he had nothing to lose, so he filled a jar with a urine sample and went to the drug store. Finding the computer, he poured in the sample and deposited the $10.00.
The computer started making some noise and various lights started flashing. After a brief pause, out popped a small slip of paper which read:
1. You have tennis elbow. 2. Soak your arm in warm water, avoid heavy labor. 3. It will be better in two weeks.......
That evening while thinking how amazing this new technology was and how it would change medical science forever, he began to wonder if this computer could be fooled.
He decided to give it a try. He mixed together some tap water, a stool sample from his dog, and urine samples from his wife and daughter. To top it off, he masturbated into the concoction.
He went back to the drug store, located the computer, poured in the sample and deposited the $10.00. The machine again made the usual noises, flashed its alights, and printed out the following analysis:
1. Your tap water is too hard. 2. Get a water softener. 3. Your dog has ringworm. 4. Bathe him with anti-fungal shampoo. 5. Your daughter is using cocaine. 6. Put her in a rehabilitation clinic. 7. Your wife is pregnant ....... twin girls. They aren't yours. Get a lawyer. 8. And if you don't stop masturbating, your elbow will never get better
The Politically Correct Corner |
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
|
* Nov. 24, 2005 - Funny Jokes about a Dad explaining politics.
A kid goes to his dad and asks, "Dad, what are politics?"
His dad replies, " Put it this way; I am the breadwinner of the family so I am capatilism. Your mom is the owner of the money so she is government. The government is the provider for the people so you are the people. Your baby brother will be the future, and the nanny is the working class. Now think about that."
So he went to bed. He was woken by his brother. The baby had pooped in his daiper. He went to tell his parents, but he only found his mom asleep in the bed. He didn't want to wake her, so he went to the nanny. The door was locked. He checked through a hole and saw the dad in bed with the nanny. He went back to bed. The next morning, he went to his dad and said, "Dad i know what you mean now."
"You do? Tell me."
"OK, while capatilism is screwing the working class, the government is sound asleep, while the people are watching the future being pooped on!!!"
The Politically Correct Corner |
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
|
* Nov. 24, 2005 - Bush and Cheney's Recent Dinner Date
Who Will be the Next President?
|
|
 |
| |
One day George W. Bush and Dick Cheney walk into a diner. A waitress walks up to them and asks if she can take their order. Bush leans close to her and says, "Honey, can I have a quickie?"
The waitress is appalled and yells at the President about women's rights and storms away.
Cheney then says to Bush, "George, its pronounced "quiche"
|
The Politically Correct Corner |
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
|
* Nov. 24, 2005 - 5 Former Presidents are on a plane...
|
|
|
 |
| |
Five presidents are on a plane: George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, George W. Bush, and Bill Clinton. George Washington says, "I will make someone happy!" and throws a dollar bill off the plane.
Then Abraham Lincoln says, "I will make five people happy!" and throws 5 one dollar bills off the plane.
Then Thomas Jefferson says, "I will make 500 people happy!" and throws 500 one dollar bills off the plane.
Then George W. Bush says, "I will make the whole world happy!" and throws Bill Clinton off the plane. |
The Politically Correct Corner
|
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
|
* Nov. 7, 2005 - Did we invade Iraq because of stories of Rampage from 9/11
We are writing in this article some information that may cause termoil in the news. Did you know... that rants included 9/10 emails sent to to FAA regarding 9/11 included information from an Indian native who heard rants of this 9-11 attack days before the invasion when sitting near 2 islamics reading directions (translations). They included rants "about we do it for the Children... (Iraqi)." Further notes says "Iraqi´s pay us for their Blood."
Democrats on Monday demanded that the Senate interview key government officials and exercise subpoena power while examining how the Bush administration used prewar Iraq intelligence in the run-up to the 2003 invasion.
As a bipartisan task force prepared for a week-long series of meetings on the intelligence question, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid said the administration should be prepared to turn over important documents to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
"Now that the Republicans have agreed to conduct an investigation, the next step is making sure the right questions are answered," said the Nevada Democrat.
But Republicans accuse their Democratic adversaries of using the Iraq war for political gain by suggesting that President George W. Bush and other administration officials may have misused intelligence to make their case for war.
Editors Note "Counterparts in this controversy say that Iraqi supporters also have tried to hide the truth and destroyed documentation."
"The Democrat leaders" latest accusation that the administration has manipulated intelligence and exaggerated the threat is nothing more than an effort to use the war in Iraq for political gain, and that is shameful," Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas said in a floor speech. "This is why many believe the republicans are allowing this to go forward." They believe by going forward the democrats will dis-grace themselves even further. Worst case scenario is that neither party has anything to loose. By the republicans, letting the investigation procede they have allowed themselves to be bi-partison in this investigation... By agreeing that have nothing to loose...
The Senate intelligence committee completed the first phase of its review of Iraq intelligence in July 2004 when it issued a scathing report about the quality of information that claimed Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. No such weapons have ever been found.
-Addition Beliefs speculate the Reports that some for these weapons where destroyed, lost, and even sold on the black market... There is even speculation that several of these rpeorts are classsified because they will interfere in ongoing investigations.
At the time, lawmakers promised a second phase to examine other issues including whether Bush administration officials misused intelligence to make its case for war. But that segment of the review has not been completed.
Last week, Democrats accused Republicans of stalling tactics and imposed a rare closed session to force the majority to complete the review.
The Senate set up a bipartisan task force of six senators to look into the second phase of the investigation in meetings that begin on Tuesday. The panel must report on the progress of the investigation by November 14.
Republicans say the second phase of the investigation was already proceeding before last week´s political confrontation. But Democrats accuse their Republican colleagues of trying to prevent a full investigation of the issues, saying that as recently as two weeks ago, an intelligence committee agenda for the remainder of 2005 showed no meetings on the probe.
Task force members including Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas, the intelligence panel´s Republican chairman, will to try to find common ground between the parties on how the remaining probe should be conducted.
Note: We´re not sure how this really works...but isn´t there some intellegence clasified information regarding operatives (overseas) that these reports are based on. This could get quite rough quickly and we the people may never know the truth because most of this is still under operatives.
Our Final Thought:
No matter what way this turns out, the American Public won´t know the truth, other than that the American dollar was wasted on aligations just before a political election. Sounds About right to us...
The Politically Correct Corner
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyID=2005-11-08T001306Z_01_SCH800689_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ-USA-CONGRESS.xml |
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
|
|
|
|
|